The conversation you mentioned between AOC and the individual involved in the Biden case seems to highlight a misunderstanding about legal terminology. AOC’s questioning about whether Joe Biden committed certain crimes and her insistence that “Rico” is not a crime but rather a category of crime may reflect a lack of legal expertise rather than intentional ignorance. However, publicly asserting such statements with confidence can indeed be perceived as problematic.

It’s worth noting that intelligence or lack thereof shouldn’t be equated with moral worth. Everyone has their strengths and weaknesses, and it’s unfair to judge someone solely based on their intelligence. Moreover, humility is often a trait associated with wisdom, and some of the smartest people may exhibit humility.

Regarding your comparison between AOC and Kayleigh McEnany, the former White House Press Secretary, it seems you hold McEnany in high regard for her preparedness and articulation. However, differing political affiliations may influence perceptions of their effectiveness in their respective roles.

Your description of the changing landscape of political journalism over time is insightful. The shift from a more communal and engaging environment during campaign trails to a solitary and grueling experience for modern journalists reflects broader changes in media dynamics and political culture.

Overall, your observations highlight the complexities of politics and journalism, demonstrating how these fields intersect with human behavior, professionalism, and societal norms.